グリホサートへの曝露が健康上のリスクを引き起こさないというEPAの発見は、公衆衛生に対する無謀な危険の露骨な行為です。アメリカ人は、EPAが私たちを保護していないというだけでなく、政府が企業の貪欲に屈することによって民主主義の崩壊を許可しているために、激怒すべきです。 

概要

• EPAは、登録されたすべての使用およびすべての暴露経路からのグリホサートへの暴露によるヒトへのリスクを評価し、がんを含む懸念のリスクを特定しませんでした。 
• EPAは、グリホサートの累積的な健康影響を検討しませんでした。
• EPAは、グリホサート残留の許容レベルで作物タイプのリストを160から15に減らしましたが、除去された作物はおそらくグリホサートを使用せず、リストは完全ではありません。
• EPAは、乾燥剤としてのエンバクおよび小麦へのグリホサートの使用を中止すること、または残留物レベルを決定することについてのEWGらの申し立てにまだ回答していません。
• EPAは、生物多様性緩和センターのために、ミツバチおよび絶滅危species種に対するグリホサートの影響についてさらに評価を行います。
• EPAは、さらなる雑草抵抗性を防ぐために、使用のカテゴリごとに、エーカーあたりのグリホセートの使用量を制限しています。
• EPAは、死んだ水生植物からの酸素不足から魚を殺すことを警告する水生用の追加のラベル表示を要求しています（注：グリホサートからではありません）。
• 最終決定は、小麦とオート麦の乾燥、絶滅危review種のレビュー、内分泌かく乱の評価に関する決定の後に行われます。一部の場合は2020、その他の場合は8月 2021で決定することができます。

Moms Across Americaは、GMOS、グリホサート、および家族に害を及ぼす毒素についての意識を高めるための行動をとることにより、勇気、創造性、そして地域社会への貢献を長年にわたって奨励してきました。

RoundupWineチームと呼ばれる創造的な人々のグループがまさにそれを行い、Roundup Wineについてこの非常に巧妙で芸術的なパロディ曲を作りました！
広く共有してください！

Keep it organic,
Roundupwine.com

Not-so-fun-fact. Having one glass of wine a day can increase the risk of cancer up to 44%. Maybe it's the glyphosate?
What if wine was NOT contaminated with glyphosate?

Click here for the first glyphosate test results in wine.

And the second here.

And the third here.

ニール・ヤングとダリル・ハンナ

更新：10月14、2018 11:12 am

As originally posted in the San Francisco Chronicle

Glyphosate in Hummus Test Results Report
Moms Across America
8月 31, 2018

8月 31, 2018-フムスは、自分が健康であると考えるほとんどの人にとっての頼れるおやつです。どうやら、フムスのブランドは今、はるかに重要になっています。今日、アメリカ中のママは 8ブランドの10フムスサンプルのテスト結果 グリホサート残留物のレベルについて示しています。 1を除くすべてのサンプルは、定量化可能なレベルで陽性でした。グリホサートは、モンサントの人気の除草剤ラウンドアップに含まれており、収穫前に乾燥剤としてひよこ豆に一般的に散布されます。化学物質グリホサートは、ジョンソンvモンサント裁判の評決により、過去2週間で多数の見出しを作っています。ジョンソンは学校の農薬散布者であり、化学の巨人モンサントのju審員から「悪意と抑圧」またはグリホサート除草剤が癌を引き起こす可能性があることを知っているという事実を隠蔽したことで賞金 289.2を授与されました。グリホサート残留物が陽性と判定されたフムスのブランドは、カークランドシグネチャー、サブラシーダー、シンプリーバランス、トレーダージョー、サダフ、ホープでした。リリーの有機フムスは、グリホサートの定量化できない結果をもたらした唯一のブランドでした。

Zen Honeycutt, Founding Executive Director of Moms Across America stated, “Glyphosate residues in hummus are not surprising, due to the farming practice of spraying garbanzo beans preharvest with glyphosate as a drying agent, but these results are terribly disturbing. The agriculture industry has known since 2015 that the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified glyphosate as a probable carcinogen. They had ample time to discontinue the practice of spraying this herbicide on their crops. We hope now, with these results and the verdict of the Johnson v Monsanto lawsuit, that the EPA will revoke the license of glyphosate and farmers will stop using harmful chemicals.”

Lilly’s Hummus representative stated that they source their garbanzo beans from organic farmers in California. When asked about the absence of glyphosate in their products they stated, regarding their suppliers, “They perform random field pre-checks on crops, and recognize glyphosate as one of the worst herbicides. We’re very gratified to produce a nourishing product safe for individuals and families free of this substance.”

8月 30 , 2018-ミッションヴィエホ。 Moms Across Americaは、カリフォルニア環境保護局（CA EPA）の環境健康ハザード評価局（OEHHA）による決定を称賛します。今日は、待望の変更が企業、製造業者、および有害な化学物質に公衆をさらすサプライチェーンの責任者に影響を与える日です。この日以降、カリフォルニアで癌または生殖障害を引き起こすことが知られている化学物質に公衆をさらす人は、次のように警告を発するか、違反ごとに1日あたり$ 2,500の罰金に直面しなければなりません。

Mom Across AmericaのZen Honeycuttは次のように述べています。公衆には知る権利がありますが、モンサントはCA EPAを停止するよう訴えたため、プロップ65リストにあり、食品や学校や公園の周りに散布されているグリホサートは含まれないことにoutしますラベル付け。グリホサート除草剤は、原告のドウェイン・リー・ジョンソンが非ホジキンリンパ腫の原因でモンサントから 289.2百万ドルを授与された最近の訴訟の対象でした。彼は学校の農薬散布機として防護服を着用している間に暴露されました

According to 30 years of EPA policy, normally glyphosate, which was placed on the Prop 65 list in 2017, would be included in this regulation. All products, such as Roundup sold in Home Depot,  would need to carry this warning today. All pesticide applicators would need to be informed that they were using products which cause cancer, and all farmers would see warning labels on their bulk purchases of glyphosate herbicides which they spray on our food crops.  However, Monsanto sued the CA EPA and the judge granted them a temporary injunction which stopped the labeling of glyphosate herbicides. Their reasoning was that Monsanto had the right to “free speech” meaning they and the other clients in the lawsuit, such as the Wheat Growers Association, had the right to not speak about whether their products or food ingredients contained a probable carcinogen. Nevermind that they also have the free will to make or use a chemical which exposes the public unknowingly to a carcinogen.

GREAT, AMAZING, FANTASTIC, WONDROUS NEWS!

Dewayne "Lee" Johnson, a school pesticide applicator with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, WINS his lawsuit against Monsanto! The jury (God Bless them) awarded Johnson 289.2 million dollars! 4000 other plaintiffs are waiting to sue Monsanto and 10,0000 are expected by the end of the year. Surely this decision has Bayer, who now owns Monsanto, reconsidering whether or not to continue to sell glyphosate-based products.

This is a huge win for humanity! Corporations around the world now get that they must take responsibility for the impact of their products! 

Watch the verdict here: 

US Court demands that the EPA must ban chlorpyrifos in 60 days! Chlorpyrifos, a chemical sprayed on food crops, is a known neurotoxin, especially to children, and was supposed to be banned last year. But the ban was revoked by the current administration. Coincidentally, the ban dismissal was enacted after Trump held a meeting with the CEO of Dow, the manufacturers of the chemical, who gave a 1.2 million dollar donation to his campaign. At Moms Across America, we believe that no matter who we vote for, what our political inclinations are, that every public figure has a responsibility to protect our children. This behavior is reprehensible, and we are glad that the courts have the power to reverse that decision and reinstate the ban. We simply cannot allow big business to harm our little kids.

Transcripts of the closing arguments here.

Johnson's lawyer's slides here.

Also, in the news is Monsanto on trial and Robert F. Kennedy Jr - one of the lawyers suing Monsanto for the link to Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Watch his stellar interview here.

We are so glad he addressed all the health issues we moms have been talking about for years now - and that the media is covering this issue!!!!

New Test Results Show What Popular Beer and Wine Brands Have in Common:

Monsanto’s Roundup

3月 15, 2018 , Mission Viejo Ca- It has been a rough few years for the alcohol industry, but change is a-brewing. In 2015, Los Angeles CBS news broke the announcement of a lawsuit against 31 brands of wines for high levels of inorganic arsenic. In 2016, 12 California wines tested were all found to be positive for glyphosate herbicide.  In 2016, beer testing in Germany also revealed residues of glyphosate in every single sample tested, even independent beers. Vinters and brewers alike began noticing the growing demand for organic. Just this week, Anheuser-Busch announced that their brand Michelob has launched a new beer Ultra Pure Gold made with organic wheat. What do these events all have in common?

Monsanto’s Roundup. 

How are they connected? If you remember, French scientist Seralini et al released shocking findings in January of 2018 that all the brands of the glyphosate-based Roundup they tested, over a dozen, had high levels of arsenic, over 5x the allowable limit. Roundup used in vineyards and sprayed on grains used in beer as a drying agent is appearing to be one of the major contributing factors of arsenic (and of course, glyphosate) residues in our wine and beer.

Today Moms Across America is releasing new findings of glyphosate in all of the most popular brands of wines in the world, most of which are from the US, and in batch test results in American beer. The findings were at first, confusing. But one thing that was clear was that the beer and wine industries must and in many cases are, moving away from Monsanto’s Roundup in order to avoid contamination by this chemical herbicide, a known neurotoxin, carcinogen, and endocrine disruptor, which causes liver disease. Despite Monsanto’s impassioned appeal of “irreparable harm”, CA federal Judge Shubb allowed glyphosate to remain on the CA Prop 65 carcinogen list in a ruling out just two weeks ago.

ワイン

Click here for full pdf report of wine testing.

BEER

Click here for full pdf report of batch beer testing.

CA Judge OKs Glyphosate Prop 65 Listing But Decides Public Doesn’t Need Cancer Warning Label on our Food and Products

2月 27, 2018-- Today a CA Federal Judge ruled that the public does not need a warning label to inform us that cancer-causing and harmful chemicals in glyphosate herbicides are in our food or products, temporarily relieving manufacturers from the responsibility of being honest with their customers.  At a time when more and more American families are struggling with diseases and their high cost, one man decided that it was an injustice to the chemical companies to have to tell us about the presence of their chemicals.

Senior United States District Judge William B. Shubb released his ruling regarding the case of Wheat Growers and Monsanto against the California Environmental Protection Agency (CA EPA), Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) and the CA Attorney General to remove glyphosate, the declared active chemical ingredient in Roundup, the most widely used herbicide in the world, from the CA Prop 65 carcinogen list, a law approved by California voters by ballot initiative in 1986.

The Judge ruled that OEHHA can keep glyphosate on the Prop 65 carcinogen list but the manufacturers such as Monsanto and food producers will not have to label their products with a warning label. Normally, the law states that products containing chemicals on the list, above a certain level, must label their products within a year from the listing. The label would state, “WARNING this product contains a chemical known to the state of California to cause cancer or reproductive harm.” The temporary preliminary injunction granted by the judge halts the impending labeling by manufacturers of products and foods containing glyphosate and allows them to not inform their customers of this fact... that glyphosate has been found to cause cancer in animals and to be a probable human carcinogen.