GREAT, AMAZING, FANTASTIC, WONDROUS NEWS!

Dewayne "Lee" Johnson, a school pesticide applicator with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, WINS his lawsuit against Monsanto! The jury (God Bless them) awarded Johnson 289.2 million dollars! 4000 other plaintiffs are waiting to sue Monsanto and 10,0000 are expected by the end of the year. Surely this decision has Bayer, who now owns Monsanto, reconsidering whether or not to continue to sell glyphosate-based products.

This is a huge win for humanity! Corporations around the world now get that they must take responsibility for the impact of their products! 

Watch the verdict here: 

US Court demands that the EPA must ban chlorpyrifos in 60 days! Chlorpyrifos, a chemical sprayed on food crops, is a known neurotoxin, especially to children, and was supposed to be banned last year. But the ban was revoked by the current administration. Coincidentally, the ban dismissal was enacted after Trump held a meeting with the CEO of Dow, the manufacturers of the chemical, who gave a 1.2 million dollar donation to his campaign. At Moms Across America, we believe that no matter who we vote for, what our political inclinations are, that every public figure has a responsibility to protect our children. This behavior is reprehensible, and we are glad that the courts have the power to reverse that decision and reinstate the ban. We simply cannot allow big business to harm our little kids.

Transcripts of the closing arguments here.

Johnson's lawyer's slides here.

Also, in the news is Monsanto on trial and Robert F. Kennedy Jr - one of the lawyers suing Monsanto for the link to Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Watch his stellar interview here.

We are so glad he addressed all the health issues we moms have been talking about for years now - and that the media is covering this issue!!!!

New Test Results Show What Popular Beer and Wine Brands Have in Common:

Monsanto’s Roundup

3月 15, 2018 , Mission Viejo Ca- It has been a rough few years for the alcohol industry, but change is a-brewing. In 2015, Los Angeles CBS news broke the announcement of a lawsuit against 31 brands of wines for high levels of inorganic arsenic. In 2016, 12 California wines tested were all found to be positive for glyphosate herbicide.  In 2016, beer testing in Germany also revealed residues of glyphosate in every single sample tested, even independent beers. Vinters and brewers alike began noticing the growing demand for organic. Just this week, Anheuser-Busch announced that their brand Michelob has launched a new beer Ultra Pure Gold made with organic wheat. What do these events all have in common?

Monsanto’s Roundup. 

How are they connected? If you remember, French scientist Seralini et al released shocking findings in January of 2018 that all the brands of the glyphosate-based Roundup they tested, over a dozen, had high levels of arsenic, over 5x the allowable limit. Roundup used in vineyards and sprayed on grains used in beer as a drying agent is appearing to be one of the major contributing factors of arsenic (and of course, glyphosate) residues in our wine and beer.

Today Moms Across America is releasing new findings of glyphosate in all of the most popular brands of wines in the world, most of which are from the US, and in batch test results in American beer. The findings were at first, confusing. But one thing that was clear was that the beer and wine industries must and in many cases are, moving away from Monsanto’s Roundup in order to avoid contamination by this chemical herbicide, a known neurotoxin, carcinogen, and endocrine disruptor, which causes liver disease. Despite Monsanto’s impassioned appeal of “irreparable harm”, CA federal Judge Shubb allowed glyphosate to remain on the CA Prop 65 carcinogen list in a ruling out just two weeks ago.

ワイン

Click here for full pdf report of wine testing.

BEER

Click here for full pdf report of batch beer testing.

CA Judge OKs Glyphosate Prop 65 Listing But Decides Public Doesn’t Need Cancer Warning Label on our Food and Products

2月 27, 2018-- Today a CA Federal Judge ruled that the public does not need a warning label to inform us that cancer-causing and harmful chemicals in glyphosate herbicides are in our food or products, temporarily relieving manufacturers from the responsibility of being honest with their customers.  At a time when more and more American families are struggling with diseases and their high cost, one man decided that it was an injustice to the chemical companies to have to tell us about the presence of their chemicals.

Senior United States District Judge William B. Shubb released his ruling regarding the case of Wheat Growers and Monsanto against the California Environmental Protection Agency (CA EPA), Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) and the CA Attorney General to remove glyphosate, the declared active chemical ingredient in Roundup, the most widely used herbicide in the world, from the CA Prop 65 carcinogen list, a law approved by California voters by ballot initiative in 1986.

The Judge ruled that OEHHA can keep glyphosate on the Prop 65 carcinogen list but the manufacturers such as Monsanto and food producers will not have to label their products with a warning label. Normally, the law states that products containing chemicals on the list, above a certain level, must label their products within a year from the listing. The label would state, “WARNING this product contains a chemical known to the state of California to cause cancer or reproductive harm.” The temporary preliminary injunction granted by the judge halts the impending labeling by manufacturers of products and foods containing glyphosate and allows them to not inform their customers of this fact... that glyphosate has been found to cause cancer in animals and to be a probable human carcinogen.

2018モンサントボードミーティングの準備

人権侵害

モンサントの製品に貢献

モンサント法廷チームのメンバー、ナブダニア、アメリカ中のママ、および米国の関係市民によって編集されたデータ。

前書き

私たちは、何よりもまず化学会社であるモンサントが、「世界を養う」ことが自分の仕事であると誤解していると提出します。モンサントの仕事は、販売する化学物質が安全かつ効果的であることを確認することです。または、人間、野生生物、家畜、土壌、水道に害を及ぼす可能性のある有毒化学物質の使用を含まない事業にリソースをリダイレクトします。モンサントには、製品とビジネス慣行のために人権侵害が発生したかどうかを調査する委員会を設置することにより、製品の安全性と完全性に対するコミットメントを維持する責任があります。

世界中の何百万人もの人々が、種子の自由の基本的権利を取り戻し、人間の健康と権利を保護し、無毒の有機農業と農生態学を促進するために取り組んでいます。私たちは、世界的に認められている人権侵害をやめさせるよう、モンサント社に呼びかけます。

あなたはそれを知っていました...という事実にもかかわらず アメリカの2人の男性のうち1人、3人の女性のうち1人が癌になると予想されています、科学、宇宙、技術に関する下院委員会に参加している米国連邦議会議員のグループは、世界保健機関の独立した科学団体を払い戻し、解体すると脅しました 国際研機関 の がん（IARC）? 

米国の資金調達は、世界保健機関の一部として、癌の問題で全世界に役立つこの身体全体を解体する影響を与える可能性があります。

衝撃的なニュース。

セラリーニとチーム、 www.criigen.org、ちょうど持っている 新しい論文を発表しました Roundupで知られている致命的な毒ヒ素と重金属、およびテストされたグリホサートベースの除草剤のほとんどの発見を明らかにしました。

ラウンドアップは、知らないうちに私の子供たちにほとんどの生涯にわたって食物を噴霧してきた母親として、怒りました。これらの毒は、私の子供たちにとって非常に多くの生命にかかわる健康上の問題の原因ですか？化学会社は、製品にヒ素が含まれていることをどのように知らないのでしょうか？ EPAはどうですか？これらの毒を私たちの食用作物に散布することを許可した場合、彼らはおそらく私たちを保護していると言うことができますか？

ミッションヴィエホ、カリフォルニア- アメリカ中のママ は、米国全50州でグリホサート除草剤を禁止する全国キャンペーンを発表します。有機消費者協会、責任技術研究所、Thinking Moms Revolutionの支援は、何百万人もの支持者とともに、州知事に居住者と子供を保護するよう促しています。

「欧州の加盟国は、弁護士や研究者による大量の科学的研究と多数の証言を考慮した後、グリホサートのライセンスの更新を拒否しました。ヨーロッパ人、およびグリホサートを禁止しているマルタ、スリランカ、オランダ、アルゼンチンにとって安全でない場合、米国でのグリホサートは望ましくありません。アーカンソー州知事とミズーリ州知事がディカンバを禁止する際に行ったような大胆な措置を講じ、グリホサート除草剤と有毒化学物質を直ちに禁止するよう、知事に要請します。」 - Zen Honeycutt、Mothers Across Americaのエグゼクティブディレクター

マサチューセッツ工科大学の科学者であるステファニーセネフ博士とグレゴリーL.ナイの最新の論文、 無脳症とグリホサート：サウザンドカットによる死。

紙への直接リンク：

https://sciforschenonline.org/journals/neurology/JNNB-3-140.php

科学者は15年以上この問題の証拠を持っています。ここでアルゼンチンの論文を参照してください：

http://www.i-sis.org.uk/glyphosateCausesBirthDefects.php