While we are grateful that the HHS has initiated Operation Stork Speed to improve the safety, reliability, relaibility and nutrion of baby formula, you should know that formulas under previous administrations, which may still be in use today, have caused great harm to babies.

As parents, we know that what we feed our babies is of utmost importance. We tend to trust what is on the grocery store shelves, thinking our government is regulating for safety and the manufacturers are motivated to be responsible for their product claims. Unfortunately, that is not always the case, and we unknowingly feed our children things that make them sick. To those of us charged with safeguarding our little babies, there is almost no worse feeling.

Mosm Across America tested the formulas and found unaccepable levels of heavy metals in all of them.

The following lawsuits, however, were largely due to bacteria that we have not tested for. 

A Response to the New York Times Article:

“A Trump Order Protected a Weedkiller. And Also a Weapon of War.”

The same industrial facility producing the herbicide Glyphosate is also the only domestic source of White Phosphorus in the United States.

Data centers form the physical backbone of artificial intelligence, cloud computing, and our modern digital lives. And around the world, their footprint is expanding at an unprecedented pace. What often appears as an abstract technological shift is, in reality, a deeply physical transformation of land, water systems, energy grids, and local communities.

As this wave of new data center facilities rises across the country, communities are beginning to ask a simple question: What does this digital infrastructure actually cost us?

President Trump’s recent glyphosate Executive Order (EO) was a massive shock to the Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) movement. We were, and continue to be, outraged. While our response, in the form of this article, may seem delayed, we have been avidly responding for over a week to various forms of media, which can be seen here.

The 2026 Farm Bill just dropped, and as expected, it contains a clause that gives chemical companies de facto immunity from lawsuits.

Unfortunately, the Farm Bill still includes a liability shield provision – Section 10205 – that does nothing to reign in pesticide approvals or preserve the ability of people to sue chemical companies when they market dangerous pesticides like glyphosate. In fact, this liability shield is more expansive than the one introduced last Farm Bill, shielding companies from liability not only when chemicals cause disastrous human health impacts, but when their products destroy soils and crops

This bill does nothing to crack down on bad actors. It merely references longstanding authority for EPA to pursue “unlawful acts” by any pesticide manufacturer, an authority it has almost never used, even when foundational studies are shown to be the product of fraud.

PESTICIDE PROVISIONS:

STRIKE!

Sec. 10202: Requires EPA to coordinate with USDA and weigh economic viability in pesticide risk and safety decisions. This embeds production economics directly into health protection decisions, putting business before safety.

Sec. 10204: Extends a statutory deadline requiring EPA to re-review all pesticides until 2031, allowing unsafe chemicals to remain on the market and delaying much-needed endocrine screenings for dozens of hormone-disrupting chemicals.

SEC. 10205: UNIFORMITY OF PESTICIDE LABELING REQUIREMENTS. This section blocks states, local, and court rights and effectively gives immunity for lawsuits.

Sec. 10206: Bans local governments from implementing local pesticide restrictions, meaning that hundreds of towns and cities across the country will lose protections put in place to stop glyphosate use in schools, playgrounds, and community parks.

Sec. 10207: Loosens restrictions on pesticides sprayed directly into bodies of water, threatening safe drinking water by allowing excess chemical contamination.

Sec. 10211:  While Section 10211 improves data collection, the package overall reduces pressure on EPA to speed up backlogged safety reviews. Section 10207 overrides other laws, potentially weakening environmental oversight, and delays overdue toxicity reviews.

EMR RELATED PROVIOSIONS:

Sec. 608: Promotes the use of wireless technology over fiber optic for precision agriculture and could be read to disallow funding for fiber networks if there is an existing qualifying and funded wireless network. 

Sec. 6302: promotes precision agriculture. Precision Ag is useful to Big Ag, but relatively hard for small farmers because of complexity and expense. Further, if not regulated, it will lead to more EMR exposure to humans, livestock and other species. Finally, it will require more infrastructure – harmful 5G and 6G cell towers – in rural areas.

Say YESMAAM! Put our children and the health and safety of our American farmers first!

By Zen Honeycutt, Kendall Mackintosh, and Triada World science advisors

On  February 4, 2026, Moms Across America (MAA) issued our Military Food Test Results exclusively to ABC. After the broadcast, a nutritionist identified a conversion error in the analysis, revealing that the information we released was inaccurate. We apologize to ABC, the public, and the military for this error. Corrections to our methodology have been made, and the following updated analysis has been reviewed by multiple nutritionists and scientists and is accurate.

Moms Across America is fueled by the dedication of mothers who have shared anecdotal experiences for over 13 years regarding our own children’s health issues. Their experiences, such as the vast improvements in their children's health when they eat organic food and avoid toxins, are valid and essential for understanding how we can all improve our own health. However, it is critical to us that all of our work, our foundation, is also backed by high-quality, independent science. 

The science gathered through nutritional testing of military food raises additional questions that must be addressed for military health and public safety, and as a matter of national homeland security.

Summary

The dataset shows a clear, repeated pattern across all menus. Military entrées contain mineral levels that are consistently and often dramatically higher than United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) baselines for comparable foods. The pattern is not random; it reflects systematic mineral-synthetic fortification and, in some cases, immense over‑fortification, particularly for sodium, manganese, calcium, iron, and copper.

1. Of the available data on 9-10 minerals assessed across 10 samples, the military’s food nutrition was up to 25% higher than USDA-comparable standards.
2. The military food samples were 40-60% higher in nutritional value than school lunches.
3. Using synthetic fortification to address low nutrient density in school lunches is not advisable, as it can pose health risks.
4. The need for any fortification highlights nutrient deficiencies in our food, perhaps due to agrochemical farming and the presence of glyphosate, a nutrient chelator found in, on average, 95%-100% of non-organic foods tested by MAA and up to 20% of organic food due to contamination.
5. Minerals such as iron, sodium, calcium, manganese, and copper were at exceptionally high levels in many of the samples tested.

Link to laboratory report

American Soldiers are Consuming Food Below USDA Standards and Dangerous Levels of Primarily Chinese Pesticides Related to GMO Foods Banned by China and Russia Militaries

President Trump Urged to Take Action - American Troops Deserve American Food!

Right now, in fact, on and since New Year's Day, our elected officials have been and are scheming to give chemical companies complete immunity from lawsuits.

Do you want chemical companies, including pesticide companies, to have the same, if not even worse, immunity than vaccine companies?
Do you think that chemical companies should get away with not being held accountable for the safety of their products?

Do you think our elected officials would be working for US if they disallowed your father or mother from suing a chemical company for compensation after getting cancer from using Roundup or any herbicide?

If you answer NO to any of these questions, then we need you to say YES to sending a quick letter to your Senator TODAY.

I find this year to be extraordinarily challenging to summarize in a short letter. Personally, this has been the most tragic year of my life. The loss of my firstborn, wonderful son Ben, has been indescribably life-altering. I have no words for the impact. I do have many words to express my gratitude for the responses from all of you. Your response, as a community, was astounding and restorative. Your texts, emails, messages, cards, gifts of art, gifts, flowers, trees, crocheted shawls and blankets, and comforting food brought tears to my eyes, many times. Ben, the reason why I started Moms Across America, is the reason why I will continue this work.

Farm Action issued the following response to an announcement from the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) on a $700M investment into regenerative agriculture.

This statement can be attributed to Angela Huffman, Farm Action’s president and co-founder: 

“Farm Action welcomes today’s announcement that the administration will direct hundreds of millions of dollars toward regenerative agriculture. Regenerative agriculture is not only better for the land and public health, but it also creates a path to rebuilding farmer profitability and reducing dependency on costly chemicals and other inputs controlled by a few giant companies.