“The Wireless Elephant in the Room” was written by Camilla Rees, MBA, Senior Policy Advisor, National Institute for Science, Law and Public Policy and Founder, ElectromagneticHealth.org and ManhattanNeighbors.org.
Hard copies in booklet form are available through Amazon.

ワイヤレスエレファント

過去20年間で健康と環境への意識が高まっていることは、私たち全員が確かに同意するでしょう。オーガニック食品、ヨガセンター、心身プログラム、ヘルスクラブ、ヒーリングアートが急増しています。健康的な「ファーストフード」レストランでさえも到着しており、大規模な食品ブランドは遺伝子組み換え作物を使用していません。消費者として、私たちは母なる地球を支え、それとの本質的な関係を尊重する「環境に優しい」選択をますます行っています。

防止

Why then, despite all this interest in health and in living ‘green’, do we have over 133 million people with a chronic illness in the U.S.— approximately 45% of the population¹, and growing? Promotion of ‘prevention,’ and, more recently, ‘rationing’ care, has been the response to high costs driven by chronic illnesses. But in looking for solutions to costs, we may be ‘missing the forest for the trees’, and also not understanding the true meaning of prevention.

The word ‘prevention’ rings hollow unless one is seeking to eliminate the factors that can lead to disease in the first place. These include unhealthy lifestyle choices, how we respond to stress, heavy metal and chemical toxicity, exposures to electromagnetic fields (EMFs), petroleum-based fertilizers, the weed killer glyphosate, GMO foods, poor nutrition, difficult relationships, etc. Today, ‘prevention’ instead typically means early detection of disease with tests like mammography, pap smear and PSA; manipulation of one’s physiology with pharmaceuticals and vaccines (which can have their own negative side effects); and, perhaps, depending on the doctor, advice to eat more vegetables and exercise. But prevention in the full sense of the word means something else entirely, and we ignore this at our peril.

True prevention means first removing from our lives those things that create biological dis-regulation and dis-ease, while identifying and proactively increasing the things that create balance and wellness.

見えない象

A health care system that does not advocate for dramatic reduction in cell phone and wireless radiation exposures ignores over six decades of scientific research showing biological and health effects from electromagnetic fields, including recent research from the NIH.^{2 3} It ignores repeated resolutions from scientists and physicians worldwide calling for caution, and the classification of cell phone and wireless radiation (radiofrequency radiation or RFR) by the WHO’s International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) as a ‘Possible Carcinogen’ (Group 2B).⁴ It ignores the experience of people in every corner of the globe with life-altering, sometimes debilitating, symptoms from acute and chronic exposures to wireless technologies. And, it turns a blind eye to the DNA-damage consequences of these wireless conveniences for ourselves today, as well as for future generations.

In parallel with the growth of chronic illnesses since the 1990s, it is hard not to notice that the amount of wireless communication infrastructure in our midst has been exploding. Four and a half billion people use a cell phone today, whereas in the early 1990s most people didn’t own a cell phone. There are now millions of cell towers radiating the planet, many hundreds of millions WiFi networks⁵ and billions of wireless devices connected to them.⁶

ソース：Wigle.net

Certainly, there has also been growth in other environmental pollutants during this period, and many people are over-drugged and suffer from drug interactions, with costly side effects, that also drive total costs. For example, on average, individuals 65 to 69 years old take nearly 14 prescriptions per year.⁷ But, as a society, we are not fully ‘seeing’ the important EMF issue in the background, which has direct effects on biology and leads to a wide range of acute and chronic health issues.

In addition to the many known biological effects, EMFs also have interactive effects with man-made chemicals, heavy metals and microorganisms in our bodies, and with metal implants and amalgams, exacerbating the biological effects. And, importantly, unknown to most people, radiofrequency radiation can impact drug actions. The radiation can both enhance and decrease the efficacy of a drug, impacting the drug actions of amphetamines, anxiolytics, opiates and alcohol to name just a few.⁸ Few prescribing physicians are focused on this, or asking patients who take pharmaceutical drugs about their exposures to wireless devices and infrastructure. Overprescribing pharmaceuticals to address electrosensitivity symptoms is one of the resulting travesties, and drugs will never solve the problem.

私たちの生物学のストレス

Our bodies are attempting to cope in an entirely different milieu than the one in which most adults today were raised. Biology is being continually stressed from the acute and cumulative effects of these pulsing energy fields and responds by creating stress proteins, as with any other kind of stressor. Is it any wonder, then, that the incidence of chronic illness has accelerated since the early 1990s alongside the rapid proliferation of these technologies?

Here is a graph showing six hours of radiofrequency radiation exposures to an individual in New York City wearing a portable dosimeter on 3月 1, 2016. The graph shows the extraordinary density of electromagnetic field exposures of different kinds, the variable nature of the pulsing and peaks, and that exposures today are way above safety guidelines based on biological scientific evidence⁹ (peaking, in this particular case, in fact, way above the top of the graph).

It should be noted that since the 1990s we have seen tremendous growth in neurological and psychological disorders, such as depression and bipolar disease, autoimmune diseases, inflammatory conditions, autism, ADHD, sleep disorders, chronic fatigue, diabetes and metabolic conditions. In children, we are seeing increases in psychiatric disorders, psychotropic medication use, chronic medical conditions, delinquency, addictions, aggression, sensory integration issues, and disability filings.¹⁰And we are seeing a growing number of reproductive issues and decreased fertility.¹¹

The BioInitiative Report (much of which was later published in Pathophysiology) synthesizes the key findings of thousands of scientific studies showing biological effects from electromagnetic fields.¹² The U.K. publication, Electromagnetic Sensitivity and Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity, available through E.S.-U.K.¹³ contains references to 1,800 studies showing effects of low-intensity exposures. There exists decades of military Radiofrequency (RF) research showing risk, much foreign research, and even an industry-funded review, “Mobile Telecommunications and Health,” prepared by the Ecolog Institute, which was issued in 2000 and lays out the known risks in great detail, including DNA risks, cancer risks and risks to children.¹⁴

The International Commission for Electromagnetic Safety (ICEMS) and the National Institute for the Study and Control of Cancer and Environmental Diseases ‘Bernardino Ramazzini’, published a report, “Non-thermal Effects and Mechanisms of Interaction Between Electromagnetic Fields and Living Matter” in 2010. This was an international effort by scientists to compile what was known at that time about the biological effects and mechanisms of action, and included studies showing EMFs create oxidative stress, blood-brain barrier permeability, genotoxic and fertility effects, heat shock (or stress) proteins, changes in the autonomic nervous system (ANS) and in neurotransmitters, and much more.¹⁵

The millions of magnetic crystals per gram of brain tissue that orient us to the Earth’s magnetic field (as high as 100 million crystals per gram in brain membranes) are also affected by artificial electromagnetic fields and are believed to be playing a role, as well, in the biological dis-regulation occurring.¹⁶

More recently, Dr. Martin Pall, Professor Emeritus of Biochemistry and Basic Medical Sciences at Washington State University, has built a case that Voltage-Gated Calcium Channel (VGCC) activation in cells from low-intensity EMFs, such as those emitted by cell phones, wireless devices and wireless infrastructure, is a primary mechanism of biological dysfunction. He believes the VGCC activation in cells can explain long-reported association between electromagnetic fields and a wide range of biological changes and health effects, including:¹⁷

1）脳の構造と機能の変化、さまざまな種類の心理的反応の変化、行動の変化など、さまざまな神経精神医学的効果。

2）少なくとも8つの異なる内分泌（ホルモン）効果。

3）不整脈を引き起こすECGの変化、生命を脅かす可能性のある変化など、心臓の電気制御に影響を及ぼす心臓の影響。

4）染色体切断および染色体構造の他の変化。

5）精巣の組織学的変化。

6）細胞死（現在、アポトーシスと呼ばれている、神経変性疾患で重要なプロセス）。

7）精子の質と機能の低下を含む男性の生殖能力の低下、および女性の生殖能力の低下（研究は少ない）。

8）酸化ストレス。

9）カルシウムフラックスとカルシウムシグナル伝達の変化。

10）細胞DNAにおける一本鎖切断および二本鎖切断を含む細胞DNA損傷、および細胞DNAにおける8 -OHdG。

11）これらのDNAの変化に関与する可能性が高いが、腫瘍促進様イベントの発生率も増加した癌。

12）骨成長の刺激を含む治療効果。

13）白内障の形成（以前は熱であると考えられていましたが、現在ではそうではないことが知られています）。

14）血液脳関門の崩壊。

15）メラトニンの枯渇と睡眠障害。

Dr. Pall says, “We’re clearly at a point where we can confidently debunk the industry’s argument of more than 20 years that there cannot be a biological mechanism of action from these low-intensity EMFs. According to industry, the forces electromagnetic fields place on electrically-charged groups in the cell are too weak to produce biological effects. However, the unique structural properties of the VGCC protein can, it turns out, explain why the force on a cell’s voltage sensor from low-intensity EMFs is millions of times stronger than are the forces on singly-charged groups elsewhere in the cell.¹⁸ They may be low intensity but with regard to the VGCCs, can have a tremendously powerful impact on the cell. Furthermore, published studies showing that calcium channel blocker drugs block or greatly lower biological effects from electromagnetic fields confirm there is a voltage-gated calcium channel mechanism that is occurring.”¹⁹

EMFからの生物学的効果につながる可能性のある他のメカニズムがあるかもしれませんが、VGCCの活性化は、さまざまな効果につながる可能性のある少なくとも1つの非常に重要な要因であるこがわかりました。

人々を健康に保ち、医療費を削減したい場合、注意を払い、部屋の「ワイヤレスエレファント」についてもっと考え始める時ではありませんか？

結局、半世紀以上にわたって科学が生物学的影響を示している一方で、放射線被曝はますます広範かつ強力になっています。

この象を認識することを恐れていまか？

専門家は警告しています

確かに、たばこ、アスベスト、鉛塗料のリスクについて真実を明らかにするのに数十年かかりましたが、電磁場の場合、専門家は、ユビキタスな曝露のために、潜在的に壊滅的な結果を防ぐために緊急に行動しなければならないと警告しますプロポーション。

Ominously, in 2013, Harvard autism expert, Martha Herbert, MD, published an article indicating that the very same biological changes happening in autism happen with electromagnetic field exposures.²⁰

彼女は、証拠は現在、新しい公衆暴露基準、および強力で暫定的な予防慣行を保証するのに十分であると言います。 「報告されたASC（自閉症スペクトラム状態）の劇的な増加は、ワイヤレステクノロジーの展開と一致するため、潜在なASC–EMF / RFRリンクの積極的な調査が必要です。

Autism now affects approximately 1 in 50 school age children,²¹ up from 1 in 1,500 in the 1990s, when the widespread proliferation of antenna infrastructure began.²² MIT Senior Research Scientist Stephanie Seneff of MIT’s Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory projects 1 in 2 children will be on the autism spectrum by 2032. If there is even a small chance EMFs could be playing a role in the growth of autism, along with other factors, like vaccines, mercury and glyphosate, the topic certainly deserves our immediate attention, given the condition’s continued non-stop growth and the seriously alarming projections.

Herbert博士は次のように述べています。これにより、一部の子供たち、特にそもそもすでに問題を抱えている人たちにとって、学習が難しくなります。」

Beyond RF impacts on attention, memory, and behavior, in extreme cases, children are exhibiting signs of “digital dementia”, where overuse of technology leads to symptoms comparable to dementia in the elderly.²³ We should be aghast that this is occurring to children, and that companies are allowed to push wireless technology on them without regard to the short- or long-term consequences.

In commercial or industrial grade WiFi, found in schools, where the RF radiation is designed to be strong enough to easily go through cement walls, and to handle dozens to hundreds of users, the rate of cardiac arrest in children can be 40x the expected rate. Instead of addressing the increasing incidence of heart irregularities in children by turning off the WiFi, some schools are sheepishly addressing the problem by installing defibrillators.²⁴ This is clearly no solution.

There is a statistically significant increased risk for brain cancer from cell phone use, enough to now upgrade the IARC classification to Group 1 ‘Carcinogen’ from ‘Possible Carcinogen’ according to recently published studies.²⁵ Young people who begin using cell phones heavily before age 20 have four to five times more risk of brain cancer by their late 20s.²⁶  Risk has been shown to increase with years and total hours of use, as would be expected.

デイビッドカーペンター、MD、アルバニー大学の健康環境研究所所長、ニューヨーク州最大の公衆衛生研究所を運営し、以前は公衆衛生学部長だった元ニューヨーク州保健局の職員アルバニー大学（SUNY）は次のように述べています。 」

In a letter to a school Board of Trustees, Martin Blank, PhD, of the Department of Physiology and Cellular Biophysics at Columbia University, and author of “Overpowered: The Dangers of Electromagnetic Radiation (EMF) and What You Can Do About It,” says, “I can say with conviction, in light of the science, and in particular in light of the cellular and DNA science, which has been my focus at Columbia University for several decades, putting radiating antennas in schools (and in close proximity to developing children) is an uninformed choice.” He adds, “Assurances that the antennas are within ‘FCC guidelines’ is meaningless today, given that it is now widely understood that the methodology used to assess exposure levels only accounts for one type of risk from antennas, the thermal effect from the power, not the other known risks, such as non-thermal frequencies, pulsing, signal characteristics, etc. They fail also to consider multiple simultaneous exposures from a variety of sources in the environment, and cumulative exposures over a lifetime. Compliance with FCC guidelines, thus, unfortunately, is not in any way an assurance of safety today, as the guidelines are fundamentally flawed.”²⁷

In 2015, 190 EMF scientists from 39 countries sent an International EMF Scientist Appeal to the United Nations, saying the World Health Organization has an internal conflicting stance on risks from electromagnetic fields, that needs strengthening, calling for protection of humans and wildlife.²⁸ Columbia’s Dr. Martin Blank was the Appeal’s spokesperson. Watch the video here:

To date, there is evidence of a connection between electromagnetic fields and nine cancers: Glioma (brain cancer), Acoustic Neuroma (tumor on acoustic nerve), Meningioma (tumor of the meninges), Salivary Gland cancer (parotid gland in cheek), Eye Cancer, Testicular Cancer, Leukemia, Thyroid Cancer and Breast Cancer. In five of these cancers, the RF-cancer connection has now been identified in multiple studies and in multiple countries.²⁹

Approximately 3-5% of people are also estimated to be electrically sensitive in developed countries,³⁰ with up to 35% mildly electrically sensitive.

Overall, the risks and warnings from scientists the world over do not paint a pretty picture, given that billions of people are now using cell phones and wireless devices, while mistakenly thinking they are safe. Wireless radiation is blanketing employees in offices, the sick in hospitals, travelers in hotels, schoolchildren in schools, people in their homes and bedrooms, and even newborns in the neonatal intensive care unit at one Los Angeles hospital.³¹

Young people of childbearing age have no idea that a fetus’ exposure to RF radiation in utero can lead to biological effects, such as effects on the brain and on organs,³² and to greater instances of emotional and social difficulties later in childhood.³³ Young men don’t know that they regularly incur risks to fertility by placing a cell phone in their pants pocket.³⁴ Elders sleeping near a WiFi router, or near a portable phone, have not been told these exposures can impact cognitive function, or lead to heart irregularities and accelerated aging.³⁵

In this video on risks from electromagnetic fields in pregnancy, The Baby Safe Project,³⁶ a collaboration between Grassroots Environmental Education and Environmental Health Trust, features Yale University’s Chair of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences and Professor of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, Dr. Hugh Taylor; Dr. Devra Davis of Environmental Health Trust; and Dr. Leo Trasande from NYU Langone School of Medicine.

出産可能年齢の人々は、これらの専門家が言っていることに注意深く耳を傾け、子宮内の携帯電話曝露と子孫のADHDに類似した症状との関連性を示す動物に関するテイラー博士の研究について聞きたいと思うでしょう。

デブラデイビス博士「成長する証拠から、健康な赤ちゃんを育てたい男性はメーカーのアドバイスに従い、携帯電話をポケットに入れないでください。妊娠も明らかな脆弱性の時代であり、それが成長の理由です 多くの医師は、携帯電話やその他の無線送信装置からのマイクロ波放射の腹部への直接曝露を避けるよう若い女性に助言しています。」と彼女は付け加えます。彼らがそうすることを選択した場合。」

あらゆる年齢の非常に多くの人々が危険にさらされているときに、主流のメディアがEMF科学を無視しているのはなぜですか？

暗闇の道

技術開発者と製造業者は、現在、「モノのインターネット」（IoT）を開発しています。ここでは、私たちの生活の中で機器や機器が私たの家庭で絶えず無線で通信しますが、これは現在の暴露に加えて、健康に悪い兆候を示しています。なぜ、複数の電子機器からの無線放射が家の聖域にあり、それらをオフにすることができずに私たちを覆っているのでしょうか？これは健康上の問題であるだけでなく、プライバシーの問題であり、商業目的で第三者が私たちの行動を詳細に研究する機会を与えます。

The FCC has given the green light to move forward with 5th generation (5G) wireless technology, saying it is in the interest of U.S. ‘economic activity,’ and it recently reallocated parts of the spectrum for it. 5G will utilize ultra-high frequencies (24 to 100+ GHz compared to 2.4 and 5 GHz currently used). Ultra-high frequencies are being permitted, despite research on 2G (GSM) technology showing risks for brain and heart tumors in federal government animal studies; despite 3G (UMTS) technology, though 1000x lower power than 2G, demonstrating several times the cancer risk compared to 2G,³⁷ ostensibly due to factors other than power, such as modulation (which has been shown to impact DNA repair genes³⁸); and, despite no health research having yet been conducted on 4G. Nonetheless, outgoing FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler says the country will be covered in a massive deployment of new 5G small cells, on which there has also been no health research. While smaller cells may not be as visible to the public as large cell towers, their presence—and radiation—will be ubiquitous and potentially much more dangerous and biologically disruptive than the radiation we experience today.³⁹

開発者によって現在進行中の5 G市場は、今後10年間で数億ドルに成長すると予測されています。

Of equal concern, large media companies like SpaceX, Google, Facebook, OneWeb, and Outernet are planning to launch WiFi from the air and space, using satellites, balloons, and drones. The Google Loon project is an example.⁴⁰

This type of out-of-the-box R&D may give tech employees a sense of purpose, with the novelty of being a welcomed stimulant, perhaps, but the real value in connecting all material things in our lives, or in using space for communications, interfering with the atmosphere, when far safer and more energy-efficient hard-wired options exist, has yet to be explained. For our health, of course, we would want to be pushing entirely different ‘edges’, such as developing meaningful connections among people, and communities, not inanimate machines, and restoring our lost relationship with nature, while using the safer, faster and more secure wired technology options that are readily available.

It appears many in technology circles really don’t understand this, for they seem to regularly mistake what is only a facsimile of interconnection for our real potential in this regard. There is no intrinsic value in ‘integrating us with our information,’ or in tethering us to our devices, or in giving data companies the ability to analyze us for their commercial gain, all while using a tremendous amount of energy to sustain wireless equipment and to store data. Product development should instead aim, fundamentally, to meet a market need, while being mindful of health, and of environmental and social impacts.

We are in a new business era, and companies will increasingly be called to account for evidence of social responsibility. We are seeing this in the loud demands for non-GMO food, for transparency in product ingredients, in the fair trade movement, in calls for vaccine injury accountability, and, for example, recently in the market response to the first interactive, internet-connected Barbie doll, ‘Hello Barbie’. Hello Barbie was lambasted by irate parents over privacy and security concerns, designated “Worst Toy of the Year” by Campaign for Commercial Free Childhood⁴¹ and flopped in the marketplace, achieving only a small fraction of predicted sales.

現在、人道に対する罪のためにハーグの国際刑事裁判所に無線会社とその幹部を連れてくることを求めている多くの国際的なグループがあります。私たちの文化。そして皮肉なことに、ノンストップで生物学的に破壊的な通信技術を実際に望ましいと考えるように私たちを誘惑する一部のテクノロジーエグゼクティブは、おそらく彼らが私たちに恩恵を与えていると信じています。近視と、どんな犠牲を払っても成長に集中することは、深遠です。社会として、私たはこの近視の根本にあるものを問う必要があります。テクノロジー界の多くの人々が人生の最も重要な側面の1つである健康を、どうやら私たち自身が電磁気的であることを否定して見落としているのはどうしてですか？それは本当に貪欲についてだけですか？

目を覚ます-転換点の前

生物学と健康への影響、病気へのリンクだけでなく、発達不良の自己価値やその他の影響などの心理的影響を含む、無線技術による私たちの生活と未来の世代への重傷が知られる日が到来します、強迫行動、依存症、隔離など。私たちはトレッドミルのネズミのように条件付けられており、ますますテクノロジーに夢中になり、薬の服用をやめることができなくなりました。多くの子どもたち ノンストップユニバースに束縛されていない可能性のある生活の質を一度も知らなかった。自然界やコミュニティと深結びついていて、人工電子機器とはつながっていないとき、彼らは平和や完全な静止状態で可能な安全感覚と内なるガイダンスを知りません。

現代のワイヤレスの世界でますます犠牲になっているのは、人々の間の意味と充足の関係、および人間とエコシステムがアクティブで、生き、支持的で楽しい関係で生きることを意図しているという認識です。代わりに、子供たちを含む多くの人々は、テクノロジーの刺激剤に執着して、いわば「リンゴを食べる」、私たちの前にあるエデンの園を無視しています。私たちは、衰退と衰退の道を歩んでおり、刺激にまだ捕らえられ、中毒になっている限り、この道にとどまります。

計算の日が到着します。衝動制御のない幼い子供のように、個人、大人、子供も同様に、人間関係と支援システムから始めて、最も重要なものが消え去るのを見て、これに関する難しいレッスンを自分で学ぶ必要があります。これはすでにすべての年齢層で起こっています。テクノロジーが約束するすべての「相互接続性」に対して、人々は言葉の本当の意味での接続性が低く、かつてないほど孤独に見えます。

そし、放射線への被曝によって傷ついているのは人間だけではありません。 2014で、米国内務省は、無線周波放射に関するFCC規格は野生生物を適切に保護していないと述べました。これは流域の瞬間でした。この国の公共部門のリーダーが、この放射線の人間、動物、植物、生態系への影響を（大々的に）認めるだけでなく、緊急に行動するのはいつなのか、私は疑問に思っています。人々は何を持っていますか 最終的に私たちの持続可能性に影響を与える電磁場からの人間の健康と環境の大惨事を予見するよりも、そのことを念頭に置いているのでしょうか？確かに、私たちはこの地球上での生活様式を完全に再考する必要があります。

この放射線による生物学的影響の証拠は新しいものではないことを理解することが重要です。害の証拠は、消費者の携帯電話やワイヤレス業界が存在する数十年前の軍事研究にまで遡ります。ユーザーが軍事環境にあったこれらの技術の初期の時代にはそれほど重要ではなかったかもしれず、暴露はまったく広まっていませんでした。しかし、今日、私たちは昼夜を問わず、放射線の密な海に住んでいます。そして、エクスポージャーは急速なペースで加速しており、政策立案者を含む人々が私たちの生活環境で何が起こっているのかを疑問視して団結しない限り、悪化し続けます。

The list of known biological effects is now very long and presents a compelling rationale for rapidly scrapping the way the FCC assesses cell phone and wireless safety, and for developing exposure guidelines that consider not only any thermal effects of the radiation, but the non-thermal (non-heating), and other effects, as well. Martin Blank, Ph.D. and Reeba Goodman, Ph.D. of Columbia University have wisely suggested using changes in DNA biochemistry as a definitive measure of risk across all the different types of frequencies.⁴²

ワイヤレス業界へのリンクと重大な利益相反を伴うFCC規制当局がいることを考えると、FCCでの自発的な変化の見込みはわずかです。最終的に変化を引き起すのはおそらく法制度でしょう。

アメリカ障害者法に基づく訴訟は、私立学校で5 Ghz WiFiからの電気過敏症状を経験し、子供の宿泊施設を探している12歳の両親によってマサチューセッツ州で進行中です。専門家によるヒアリングはまもなく完了する予定であり、科学が「電気感受性」の状態をサポートするのに十分であるかどうかについて司法上の決定が下されます。その後、訴訟は司法判断またはju審裁判のいずれかに進みます。

2014における携帯電話のリスクに関する複数当事者訴訟（Murray et al v。Motorola et al）で、判事Frederick H. Weisbergは次のように述べています。

「携帯電話の放射線が発がん性であるという合理的可能性さえある場合、公衆衛生および規制部門での行動の時が来ています。そのようなデバイスを制限するための金銭的および社会的コストは重要ですが、それらのコストは何もしないことによる人間の生活のコストに比べてpale色が少なく、初期の兆候が正しい方向を向いていることを今から30年または40年発見します。発がん性の確率が低いが、潜在的な害の大きさが大きい場合、良い公共政策は、リスクを無視すべきではないことを示しています。

But we cannot afford to wait for government, the legal system, or the health care system to effectively respond before acting to protect and preserve our biology. People can do a lot now preventatively to protect health if they understand the risks, while also encouraging an appropriate response from our government, especially Congress. See 50+ EMF Safety Tips and Insights and For Parents to Know.

コストへの接続

それでは、予防と私たちのヘルスケアシステムに戻りましょう。現在、私たちは、多くの人々の問題がこれらの曝露に起因する場合、無線放射線（または他の環境要因）への曝露を最小限にする必要性について人々を教育していない肥大化した高価な医薬品および治療指向のヘルスケアシステムに支払いをしています。代わりに、症状が現れるまで待ってから、薬で治療し、生理学を調節しますが、問題の根本に対処することはありません。これは勝てない状況です。

People are given sleeping pills, for example, instead of being told to try turning off the wireless router, or heart medications, instead of being told wireless radiation can lead to heart irregularities (in one study increasing the heart rate in 40% of subjects—almost doubling the rate in one subject).⁴³ Children by the millions are being given ADHD medications, while increasingly tethered to biologically disturbing wireless devices that could be contributing to attention difficulties. Homeowners across the country do not know the new radiating utility meters are making them sick, or that they can, in many cases, opt-out.⁴⁴

リストは続きます。私たちの健康はこれらの暴露によって侵食されていますが、多くは私たちの日々の管理下にあります。

In a Harvard Safra Center for Ethics report, “Captured Agency: How the Federal Communications Commission is Dominated by the Industries it Presumably Regulates,” the authors said ‘public ignorance’ is the best ally of industry.  But this ignorance about wireless impacts won’t last.  People are increasingly motivated to find solutions to their health challenges themselves, in part due to the new, very high deductible insurance plans. This is good. As health costs rise higher and higher, sooner or later more and more people will likely connect the dots between a wide range of health challenges and wireless devices and infrastructure—ranging from inflammation- related problems, like joint pain, to neurological diseases, heart irregularities, brain tumors, low fertility, and cancers—and decide to minimize their personal exposures.

新しい健康保険指令は、高価な（そしてほとんどの人にとっては法外な）入院費用、患者の年間自己負担費用の上限など、人々の医療費に対して医療システムが存在することを保証することを目指していますが、システムは確かにありません今は予防に「患者に奉仕しない」、または電磁界などの慢性疾患の成長をそもそも引き起こす不均衡の根本原因を解しようとする。人々に手頃な価格のケアを提供することは価値がありますが、現在のアプローチは、ほとんどではないにしても多くの病気を予防できた後、下流のヘルスケアシステムにパッチを当てようとしています。

Only when we start focusing on root sources of imbalances, like EMFs, as well as food and water toxicity, chemicals in everyday products, GMOs, glyphosate, pharmaceuticals, vaccines, poor nutrition, etc., and decide to teach people how to live healthily, will we be offering the quality of care that has a chance of actually getting people better. Otherwise, without telling people the truth on these matters, we’ve essentially given up on peoples’ health potential from the get-go.

EMFに関しては、人々を疲れさせ、イライラさせ、気を散らし、落ち込み、不安、中毒、非生産的、非友好的、そして「ゾンビ」のような気分にさせることができる生物学的に邪魔なワイヤレステクノロジーに継続的にさらされることを許可しています脳腫瘍のような多くの重篤で生命を脅かすものを含む多くの病気につながります。

Significant harm is being done to our society biologically, psychologically, spiritually and economically right before our eyes. A poll by Common Sense Media reported on by CNN recently indicated half of teenagers believe they are addicted to their smartphones.⁴⁵

Isn’t it time we courageously acknowledge the damaging impact of cell phones and wireless technologies and find a new path forward?

なぜ、本質的に、商業、利益のために、前例のない規模で、人間、動物、自然、特に子供に損害を与えている無線業界の誤った価値の付随的な損害であることに同意する必要があるのですか？

私は皆、健康のために立ち上がって、質問を始め、病気と死を広めているこの闇の産業が、私たちの健康と次世代の健康を守るために適切に規制されることを要求することを奨励します。

The Author:  Camilla Rees, MBA is an internationally respected researcher and educator on the biological and health effects of electromagnetic fields, and co-author of “Public Health SOS: The Shadow Side of the Wireless Revolution”.  She founded ElectromagneticHealth.org and Campaign for Radiation Free Schools (Facebook) and co-founded the International EMF Alliance. Camilla is a Senior Policy Advisor to the National Institute for Science, Law and Public Policy; Advisory Board member of the International Institute for Building-Biology™ & Ecology; a Voting Member of the U.S. Health Freedom Congress; and EMF Advisor to Citizens for Health, Radiation Research Trust (U.K.) and Mercola.com.

参考文献

1. Partnership to Fight Chronic Disease report 
2. Scientific American, 5月 27, 2016. http:s//www.scientificamerican.com/article/major-cell-phone-radiation-study-reignites-cancer-questions/
3. Bioinitiative and Ecolog Reports. Thousands of studies showing biological effects from low-intensity radiation were synthesized in the BioInitiative Report (last update 2012, 2014) (www.bioinitiative.org). Many other reviews of the science exist, such as the Ecolog Report, a review commissioned by T-Mobile and Deutsche Telecom MobilNet GmbH, prepared in 2000, which outlined much of the science showing biological effects from cell phone radiation, including gene toxicity, impacts on cellular processes, effects on the immune system, central nervous system, hormone systems and connections with cancer and infertility (https://bemri.org/hese-uk/en/niemr/ecologsumd240.html?content_type=&style=print).
4. WHO/IARC Classified Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields as Possibly Carcinogenic to Humans, https://electromagnetichealth.org/electromagnetic-health-blog/iarc-rf-carc/
5. Map of global WiFi Networks from Space. https://www.businessinsider.com/wi-fi-map-of-largest-cities-in-the-world-2015-9
6. Information Week https://www.informationweek.com/mobile/mobile-devices/gartner-21-billion-iot-devices-to-invade-by-2020/d/d-id/1323081
7. Minnesota Geriatrics https://www.minnesotageriatrics.org/Topics_october_15.pdf; American Society of Consulting Pharmacists
8. ワシントン大学のヘンリー・ライ博士、4月 11-17にメール。 2016
9. Bioinitiative Report www.Bioinitiative.org
10. Victoria Dunckley, MD at Commonwealth Club of California, https://vimeo.com/132159417
11. Letter to Parents on Fertility and Other Risks to Children from Wireless Technologies http://electromagnetichealth.org/electromagnetic-health-blog/letter-to-parents/
12. Bioinitiative Report BioInitiative.org
13. Electrosensitivity U.K., https://www.es-uk.info/
14. Ecolog Report commissioned by T-Mobile and Deutsche Telecom, https://electromagnetichealth.org/electromagnetic-health-blog/t-mobile-deutsche/
15. ICEMS Report https://electromagnetichealth.org/electromagnetic-health-blog/icems/
16. キルシュヴィンクJL：生体電磁学17（3）：187-194、1996
17. マーティンポール博士から受け取ったメール4/13/ 16
18. Rev Environ Health. 2015;30(2):99-116. doi: 10.1515/reveh-2015-0001. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25879308
19. J Cell Mol Med. 2013 Aug; 17(8): 958–965. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3780531/
20. Harvard Autism Researcher Warns. http://www.marthaherbert.org/library/Herbert-Sage-2013-Autism-EMF-PlausibilityPathophysiologicalLink-Part21.pdf
21. Reuters https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-autism-idUSBRE92J0YX20130320
22. NIMH. https://www.nimh.nih.gov/about/director/2009/nimhs-response-to-new-hrsa-autism-prevalence-estimate.shtml
23. Digital Dementia. https://vimeo.com/71749330; https://www.alzheimers.net/2013-11-12/overuse-of-technology-can-lead-to-digital-dementia/
24. Safety Code 6 testimony by Rodney Palmer to the Royal Society of Canada, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uSBwyrZOGQ0
25. Lennart Hardell, MD. https://lennarthardellenglish.wordpress.com/category/iarc/
26. Hardell＆Carlberg、携帯電話、コードレス電話、および脳腫瘍のリスク。 International Journal of Oncology 35：5-17、2009
27. Martin Blank, Ph.D. Letter https://electromagnetichealth.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/blank.pdf
28. EMF Scientist Appeal to UN. https://emfscientist.org/
29. L.ロイドモーガン、環境健康トラスト、シニアリーチフェロー
30. Reported functional impairments of electrohypersensitive Japanese: A questionnaire survey https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0928468012000442
31. Cedars Sinai, Los Angeles, iPads in Neonatal Intensive Care. https://www.cedars-sinai.edu/About-Us/News/News-Releases-2013/iPads-Help-New-Moms-Bond-With-Their-Infants-in-the-Neonatal-Intensive-Care-Unit.aspx
32. Commonwealth Club of California, 6月 22, 2015. Dr. Nesrin Seyhan, https://vimeo.com/132881352, and Suleyman Kaplan, MD, https://vimeo.com/132987053
33. UCLA & Danish study-Social-Emotional Effects Later in Life from Fetal Exposure https://ph.ucla.edu/news/press-release/2011/mar/study-questions-safety-childrens-exposure-cell-phones-during-prenatal
34. Letter to Parents on Fertility and Other Risks to Children from Wireless Technologies by Camilla Rees of ElectromagneticHealth.org https://electromagnetichealth.org/electromagnetic-health-blog/letter-to-parents/
35. Rapid Aging Syndrome video by Magda Havas, Ph.D., https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6z9Dpe66SzE&feature=player_embedded#at=14
36. The BabySafe Project. https://www.babysafeproject.org/the-science/
37. Mercola.com https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2015/01/06/cell-phone-use-brain-cancer-risk.aspx; International Journal of Oncology https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3829779/
38. IYBelyaev, Impairment of DNA Repair Genes. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yCHlhmX9Bio
39. LA Times on 5G. http:s//www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-cellphone-5g-health-20160808-snap-story.html
40. C4ST https://c4st.org/international-coalition-objects-to-googles-project-loon/
41. Fortune, Hello Barbie, https://fortune.com/2015/12/08/worst-toy-year/
42. Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine, 6月 7, 2012, Electromagnetic fields and health: DNA-based dosimetry https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.3109/15368378.2011.624662
43. Radiation from Cordless Phones Cause Heart Irregularities. https://electromagnetichealth.org/electromagnetic-health- blog/cordless-heart/
44. Smart Meters—not so Smart – How Dangerous and Expensive Became “Smart” – An Exposé of the “Smart Grid”, Amy Worthington https://www.westonaprice.org/health-topics/smart-meters-not-so-smart/
45. Half of Teenagers Addicted to Smart Phones https://www.cnn.com/2016/05/03/health/teens-cell-phone-addiction-parents/